Primary Owner: KITTY WILSON
Statement Number: S013174
Date Submitted: 05/15/2016
1. Water is used under
Riparian Claim
2. Year diversion commenced 1975
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and Amount of Water Diverted and Used
Month Rate of diversion
Amount directly diverted
Amount diverted or
collected to storage
Amount beneficially used
January 200 0.019027 0 0.019027
February 200 0.017186 0 0.017186
March 500 0.047568 0 0.047568
April 2000 0.184133 0 0.184133
May 3000 0.285407 0 0.285407
June 3500 0.322233 0 0.322233
July 4000 0.380542 0 0.380542
August 4100 0.390056 0 0.390056
September    2500 0.390056 0 0.390056
October 3000 0.285407 0 0.285407
November 200 0.018413 0 0.018413
December 210 0.019978 0 0.019978
Total   2.360006 0 2.360006
Type of Diversion Direct Diversion Only
Comments Water is used for stock and irrigation
Water Transfers
8e. Water transfered No
8f. Quantity transfered (Acre-Feet)
8g. Dates which transfer occurred / to /
8h. Transfer approved by
Water Supply Contracts
8i. Water supply contract No
8j. Contract with
8k. Other provider
8l. Contract number
8m. Source from which contract water was diverted
8n. Point of diversion same as identified water right Yes
8o. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to divert under this contract
8p. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to be diverted in 2013
8q. Amount (Acre-Feet) projected for 2014
8r. Exchange or settlement of prior rights
8s. All monthly reported diversion claimed under the prior rights
8t. Amount (Acre-Feet) of reported diversion solely under contract
5. Water Diversion Measurement
a. Measurement
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted and/or diverted to storage
b. Types of measuring devices used
c. Additional technology used
Description of additional technology used
d. Who installed your measuring device(s)
e. Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s)
f. Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective"
  • Diversion is small or minimal in size
  • No power at diversion point
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in Section 1 are "not locally cost effective" I would personally be unable to set up a monitoring system with the distance between diversion and power source. My usage is such that to monitor seems unreasonable.
g. Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement
  • Crop duty estimates/consumptive use estimates
  • Modeled/estimated flows
Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement Based on pump ability and hours of use.
6. Purpose of Use
Domestic 2
Irrigation 2 Acres Other
Stockwatering 4 goats
7. Changes in Method of Diversion
8. Conservation of Water
a. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? Yes
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated Watering is done in early morning and evening Set up drip systems
b. Amount of water conserved Acre-Feet
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to conservation efforts.
9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation
a. Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial causes? No
b. Amount of reduced diversion
Type of substitute water supply
Amount of substitute water supply used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of a substitute water supply
10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater
a. Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water? No
b. Amount of groundwater used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of groundwater.
11a. Additional Remarks
File Name Description Size
No Attachments
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form
First Name Kitty
Last Name Wilson
Relation to Water Right Diverter of Record
The information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief Yes