[SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBMITTED VERSION]


SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF WATER DIVERSION AND USE FOR 2014

Primary Owner: SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES
Statement Number: S022665
Date Submitted: 06/26/2015
1. Water is used under
Riparian Claim
2. Year diversion commenced 2011
3-4. Maximum Rate of Diversion for each Month and Amount of Water Diverted and Used
Month Rate of diversion
Amount directly diverted
(Gallons)
Amount diverted or
collected to storage
(Gallons)
Amount beneficially used
(Gallons)
January 0 0 0
February 0 0 0
March 0 0 0
April 0 0 0
May 0 0 0
June 0 0 0
July 0 0 0
August 0 0 0
September    0 0 0
October 0 0 0
November 0 0 0
December 0 0 0
Total   0 0 0
Comments No dust abatement needed for 2014 operations.
Water Transfers
8e. Water transfered No
8f. Quantity transfered (Acre-Feet)
8g. Dates which transfer occurred / to /
8h. Transfer approved by
Water Supply Contracts
8i. Water supply contract No
8j. Contract with
8k. Other provider
8l. Contract number
8m. Source from which contract water was diverted
8n. Point of diversion same as identified water right
8o. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to divert under this contract
8p. Amount (Acre-Feet) authorized to be diverted in 2014
8q. Amount (Acre-Feet) projected for 2015
8r. Exchange or settlement of prior rights
8s. All monthly reported diversion claimed under the prior rights
8t. Amount (Acre-Feet) of reported diversion solely under contract
5. Water Diversion Measurement
a. Measurement
Direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective" for water directly diverted and/or diverted to storage
b. Types of measuring devices used
c. Additional technology used
Description of additional technology used
d. Who installed your measuring device(s)
e. Make, model number, and last calibration date of your measuring device(s)
f. Why direct measurement using a device listed in Section 1 is "not locally cost effective"
  • Other
Explanation of why use of devices and technologies listed in Section 1 are "not locally cost effective" No water diverted.
g. Method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement
  • Other
Explanation of method(s) used as an alternative to direct measurement No water diverted.
6. Purpose of Use
Other N/A
7. Changes in Method of Diversion
 
8. Conservation of Water
a. Are you now employing water conservation efforts? No
Describe any water conservation efforts you have initiated
b. Amount of water conserved Acre-Feet
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to conservation efforts.
9. Water Quality and Wastewater Reclamation
a. Are you now or have you been using reclaimed water from a wastewater treatment facility, desalination facility, or water polluted by waste to a degree which unreasonably affects such water for other beneficial causes? No
b. Amount of reduced diversion
Type of substitute water supply
Amount of substitute water supply used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of a substitute water supply
10. Conjuctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater
a. Are you now using groundwater in lieu of surface water? No
b. Amount of groundwater used
I have data to support the above surface water use reductions due to the use of groundwater.
11a. Additional Remarks
 
Attachments
File Name Description Size
No Attachments
Contact Information of the Person Submitting the Form
First Name Sierra Pacific Industries
Last Name J Podva
Relation to Water Right Diverter of Record
The information in the report is true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief Yes